Taxes That Fund Mosquito and Vector Control

Links to documents:

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

District Daily Press, the Stockton East Water District will be switching over their water system to solar power which will save them nearly $9.5 million

2015 Total Funds Awarded $84,840

DUNS 094868239

2014 Total Funds Awarded $81,250

DUNS 094868239

Geographic Distribution of WNV Activity in Mosquitoes

San Joaquin County 2004-2013

west-nile-matches-vacant-zones-and-injuries-compare-to

 

Cal:Tax_San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector Control District – California Tax Foundation

The mosquito & vector control district imposes a special tax, approved by voters on 11/03/81

Levy Type: Special Tax

Sunset Date: Indefinite

Cal-Tax_San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector Control District - California Tax Foundation

Insurance commissioner’s Funding Recommendation

2012-2013-Potential Spending Authority

San Joaquin

2011-2012 $608,808.

2012-2013 $478,031.

 

11-05-02_Measure R: Mosquito Abatement – San Joaquin County, CA

08-04-06_WNV Funds ER

 

FEMA Recovery Policy-RP9523_10

Health and Safety code

San Joaquin County Vector has their own lab and they do their own testing for WNV positive. They are the ones who report a high threshold meeting state of emergency levels for additional funding.

It’s very hard to find all of the funding Arnold gave generously to the vector agency never concerning him self to see how honest the men who run the agency were.

Management controls and manipulates all the resources to ensure the funds continue to roll in. Millions were allocated every year.

The West Nile state of emergency funding would be rolled up in a package and allocated for multiple agencies in the  county.

The problem I ran into is the agency that governed enforcement of the vector like OSHA…ect If you were benefiting financially from an entity that you were supposed to govern and fine would you stop the  gravy train?

“How does an agency govern another agency when they receive funds for by agency they were designed to enforce policy compliance over them?

(NPDES) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System is a law which requires a permit to report all chemicals vector control is allowed to use.  NPDES requires vector to return to sites to test water and soil and report for toxicity and residue where applications were made.

According to the Sixth Circuit Court Ruling on National Cotton Council of America v. U.S. EPA (553 F.3d 927 (6th Cir., 2009)), the application of pesticides at, near, or over waters of the United States that results in discharges of pollutants requires coverage under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. In response to the Sixth Circuit Court’s decisions and previous decisions by other courts on pesticide regulation, the State Water Board has adopted four Pesticide Permits.

The Joint Vector Power formed a coalition to lobby against NPDES compliance required to discharges in the waters of the US. They fought to keep their exempt status and was defeated. Their coalition is strongly funded with our money and if they could change their reporting of toxic affects they would.

The 2009-10 fiscal year, as reported to the California State Controller by 4,792 special districts in California.

Vector pools funds together with many county agency’s to create special districts with super sized funding. Our employees union was forced out by our manager. During negotiations they use multiple law firms against the 15 pesticide applicators who do hazardous job duties.

They keep on retainer multiple high end law firms, Risk Management that has participated in retribution to me after filing a Whistle Blower Hotline and filing a written Sexual Harassment complaint to the RISK Management Rep. They are self insured and  work comp injuries are denied by themselves.

I have witnessed  them deny employee injuries that were complete negligent and they were fully responsible for.  They deny medical and benefits ti the injured worker. They do not report to OSHA. They commit fraud by denying valid injury claims.  The state requires they provide insurance for injured employees,  but the money is abused by the adjuster of claims, the firm Stockwell Harris and the (QME’s) Qualified Medical Examiner.  They deny claims to diminish the reality of  the real hazards and job injuries.  This gives them a higher score for self insurance and  lower rates, The money they save is invested in mutual funds.

 

 

WNV post

 

Screen Shot 2015-12-31 at 5.21.58 PM

Screen Shot 2015-12-31 at 5.32.29 PM

 

 

West Nile Task Force

West Nile Task Force

10-16-02 Measure R

10-16-02_Page_01 10-16-02_Page_02

10-16-02_Page_03 10-16-02_Page_04

10-16-02_Page_05 10-16-02_Page_06

10-16-02_Page_07 10-16-02_Page_08

10-16-02_Page_09 10-16-02_Page_10

10-16-02_Page_11 10-16-02_Page_12

10-16-02_Page_13

10_22_02

10_22_02_Page_1 10_22_02_Page_2

 

11-05-02_Measure R: Mosquito Abatement – San Joaquin County, CA

This file is 51 pages, please click the link below to view it in its entirety
06-01-04_CA Resp Plan

06_01_04_CA-Resp-Plan01

09-16-04 WNV Funds Allocated

 

 

 

09-16-04 WNVFUNNDS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

07-27-05_WNV Funds ER

 

07-27-05_WNV Funds ER_Page_1

 

 

 

09-00-05_Stroh_San_Joaquin_County_WNV

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St01 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St02

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St03 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St04

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St057 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St06

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St07 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St08

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St09 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St10

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St11 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St12

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St13 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St14

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St15 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St16

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St17 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St18

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St19 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St20

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St21 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St22

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St23 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St24

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St25 7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St26

7 - Stroh Mosquito Control in Response to WNV.ppt - 09-00-05_St27

10-01-06 Department of Health Services Re West Nile Funding

10-01-06 Department of Health Services Re West Nile Funding

 

 

 

04-01-10_CA Department of Public Health MVCAC ca_surveillance_response_plan

06-27-12_AB 1484 Assembly Bill – Bill Analysis

07-26-12 AssembyBill 1484 Ripon ExcessDist

09-04-14 FIOA CA Regional H2O Quality Control Board

09-04-14 FIOA CA Regional H2O Quality Control Board01 09-04-14 FIOA CA Regional H2O Quality Control Board02

09-04-14 FIOA CA Regional H2O Quality Control Board03

 

 

08-10-07 West Nile Funding

08-10-07 West Nile Funding

 

 

 

Audit

06-30-14 SJCMVCD FS Independant audit no!

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*